Microinsurance to be on the agenda for the UN-Climate
Conference in Copenhagen

MicroEnsure, 6 August 2009

A milestone for microinsurance was passed when it was featured in the draft negotiating text for the climate summit that will establish strategies for climate change adaptation following the Kyoto Protocol

 

Dr. Koko WarnerAn increase in extreme weather will have greatest impact in developing countries

According to the 4th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC 207), human-induced climate change trends will continue to have a major influence on weather related risks. These risks play an important role for segments of the growing microinsurance sector and this is evidenced by the increasing number of weather index crop insurance projects under way in the developing world.

The ongoing United Nations climate negotiations are addressing extreme weather risks, their impact on vulnerable countries and vulnerable groups of people, and the possibility of using risk reduction and insurance approaches to adapt to climate change. Microinsurance has been highlighted as a possible way to enhance disaster risk management and develop opportunities for the poor (Hellmuth et al. 2009).

Climate change and microinsurance

An important milestone was passed at the June 2009 Climate Talks in Bonn, Germany. The secretariat to the climate negotiations, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), released the draft negotiating text that will be transformed between now and December into the Copenhagen Agreement - the critical juncture for fighting climate change once the Kyoto Protocol's commitment period ends in 2012. The current negotiating text lays out the crucial points for establishing risk reduction and insurance, including microinsurance, in the Copenhagen treaty: Three key points relate to microinsurance.

  • First, the negotiating text offers alternatives for a risk management framework that includes insurance. At the June Climate Talks, parties from both developed and developing countries expressed broad consensus and support for risk reduction and microinsurance. Countries as diverse as Bangladesh, the United States of America, Australia, Mexico, and Switzerland showed interest in microinsurance approaches that can help people living in countries particularly vulnerable to the negative effects of climate change adapt to these changes.
  • Second, the negotiating text lays out options to use adaptation funding to pay for a range of risk reduction and risk transfer approaches, including microinsurance.
  • Third, the negotiating text calls for the international community to consider enabling activities such as the creation and sharing of climate and weatherrelated data and institutional support for adaptation and related activities, including microinsurance.

In the next phases of negotiation in August and September of this year, delegates will discuss the options on the table, refine the negotiating text, and discuss what kinds of institutional arrangements would need to be in place to implement the elements that could become the Copenhagen agreement. Experts expect that microinsurance approaches will be the focus of concrete funding and operational discussions in the upcoming international negotiations.

Christoph Bals, Vice Chairman of MCII and Executive Director of the NGO Germanwatch expects that "the climate negotiations will, by the end of 2009, create an adaptation framework with risk management - of which insurance solutions targeting the most vulnerable in developing countries will be part."

Insurance proposals at the climate negotiations

Between the climate conference in Poznan, Poland at the end of 2008 and June of this year, negotiators have stressed the need for risk management, including insurance as an element of risk management, in the architecture of the Copenhagen Agreed Outcome (UNFCCC 2008a, 2008b). In Poznan, Bangladesh noted that at the international level, any risk management framework adopted should incorporate microinsurance as an element for addressing the risk transfer needs of the most vulnerable.

Delegates from Bangladesh recommended for the COP to investigate means to catalyse the initiation of new and innovative microinsurance approaches, building upon available models. Bangladesh has maintained this proactive stance and garnered further support from other countries for its microinsurance-related adaptation proposals. Such delegations have called for microinsurance pilots and including index-based schemes in developing countries, with support for such programs from international and national private sector sources.

Numerous proposals have been put forward during the climate negotiations that mention insurance.¹ Two detailed insurance-related proposals were tabled by the Association of Small Island States (AOSIS) and the Munich Climate Insurance Initiative (MCII - of which MicroEnsure is a member).

The two proposals explore how risk management including insurance mechanisms could fit into a longerterm adaptation financing framework (i.e. post-2012) (AOSIS 2008, MCII 2008). Both proposals emphasize that risk prevention and risk reduction are the points of departure for managing climate-related disasters.

Flooded VillageMCII´s proposal further envisions a Climate Insurance Facility to catalyse nascent risk sharing and risk transfer systems including microinsurance. Such a facility could create the necessary framework for microinsurance and other locally-tailored approaches to help the vulnerable adapt to climate change.

MCII proposes that this facility could provide support for data collection, technical support, activities that lower transaction costs, and enable scaling up of microinsurance approaches. It is also possible that such a facility could pool medium level risks, providing a kind of reinsurance to numerous small insurance schemes.

Key questions for the microinsurance industry

Climate negotiators express great interest engaging the private sector and other relevant stakeholders and communities in the context of climate risk insurance for those most vulnerable to climate change, the poor. Several questions arise about what microinsurers would need to participate in any mechanism created by the UNFCCC Copenhagen agreement in December 2009.

Climate negotiators express great interest engaging the private sector and other relevant stakeholders and communities in the context of climate risk insurance for those most vulnerable to climate change, the poor. Several questions arise about what microinsurers would need to participate in any mechanism created by the UNFCCC Copenhagen agreement in December 2009.

What would be most necessary to engage in the design and provision of climate risk insurance, the private sector? Professor Peter Hoeppe of Munich Re emphasized that "The insurance sector would need assurance that premiums for the various insurance programs would be "risk adequate"- meaning that the premiums are sufficient to cover expected losses."

Correct, risk adequate pricing is a key for sustainable microinsurance business. In many of the target developing countries the data base for pricing is currently insufficient. For countries without suitable meteorological as well as historical loss data, it is imperative to build up systems that could fill data gaps in the medium term. During a transition phase before all necessary data is in place, modelling approaches and comparisons with other similar countries where data is available could help to make risks in such countries insurable.

Further, while the appropriate data basis is being established, the potential for inaccurate loss estimates could be covered by an insurance pool solution such as that suggested by MCII.

As currently the losses from weatherrelated disasters in developing countries are about 7% of global losses, cover of this kind should not pose an insurmountable obstacle for the capital requirements of insurance. Climate risk insurance programs, such as that proposed by MCII, could be established in a time range of 3 to 5 years - assuming prompt action would be taken to establish a sufficient basis of data.

On the road to Copenhagen

During the current Bonn Climate Talks, the delegations called strongly for insurance measures and began hammering out negotiating text reflecting their priorities regarding insurance. What delegates need now is input from microinsurance experts about what has worked in the past, what kinds of institutional set-ups are needed, and examples of how microinsurance could be made to work with international support in the context of climate change. Prof. Peter Hoeppe,

Chair of MCII and Head of Geo Risks Research of Munich Re: The decision at the climate talks in Bonn has made it very likely that insurance solutions for developing countries will be part of the climate agreement that hopefully will be decided upon at the end of this year.

Dr. Koko Warner is a founding member and Executive Director of the Munich Climate Insurance Initiative (MCII). Warner also leads Climate Adaptation Section at the United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS). She researches adaptation and climate risk insurance, and financial mechanisms to assist the poor. Warner serves on the editorial board of the International Journal of Global Warming.

¹ Most recently proposals have come from countries like Switzerland, Mexico, some countries of the European Union and further ideas from Bangladesh (for the LDCs), China, India, Argentina, the Philippines, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia and other countries, and from Observers like Munich Climate Insurance Initiative (MCII), the Climate Adaptation Network (CAN), and others.

References

Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) (2008). Proposal to the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (AWG-LCA). "Multi-Window Mechanism to Address Loss and Damage from Climate Change Impacts". Submission to the UNFCCC on 6 December 2008.

http://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/aosisinsurance061208.pdf.

Hellmuch, M.E., Osgood, D.E., Hess, U., Moorhead, A., and Bhojwani, H. (eds) 2009. Index insurance and climate risk: Prospects for development and disaster management. Climate and Society No. 2. International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI), Columbia University, New York, USA.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report Climate Change 2007: Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Munich Climate Insurance Initiative (MCII) (2008). Proposal to the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (AWG-LCA). "International Insurance Mechanism: A proposal for the Copenhagen Agreed Outcome". Submission to the UNFCCC on 6 December 2008. 4th session of the AWG-LCA. Poznan 1-13 December, 2008.http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/smsn/ngo/033.pdf

UNFCCC (2008a). "Report on the workshop on risk management and risk reduction strategies, including risk sharing and transfer mechanisms such as insurance: Summary by the chair of the workshop." Available on the UNFCCC website, document FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/CRP.7 from 6 December 2008.

UNFCCC (2008b). Mechanisms to manage financial risks from direct impacts of climate change in developing countries.  21 Nov 2008 FCCC/TP/2008/9

Further reading

ALIBER, M. and IDO; A. (2002): Microinsurance in Burkina Faso. Social Finance Programme & InFocus Programme on Boosting Employment through Small Enterprise Development. International Labour Office. Geneva.

ALL INDIA DISASTER MITIGATION INSTITUTE (2006): Community Risk Transfer through Microinsurance: An Opportunity for South Asia.

BALS, C., WARNER, K., BUTZENGEIGER, S. 2006. Insuring the Uninsurable: Design options for a climate change funding mechanism. Climate Policy, special journal edition. Gurekno, G. (ed.). Volume 6, Number 6, 2006. pp. 637-647.

BARNETT, B.J., C.B. BARRETT, J.R. SKEES (2008): Poverty Traps and Index-Based Risk Tranfer Products. In: World Development (2008). Article in Press (Elsevier).

BOUWER L.M., J.C.J.H. AERTS (2006): Financing climate change adaptation. In: Disasters. Vol. 30, No. 1 (2006). Pp. 49-63.

CHARPENTIER, A. (2008). Insurability of climate risks. The Geneva Papers. Vol. 33 (91-109).

CHURCHILL, C. (Editor) (2006): Protecting the Poor. A Microinsurance Compendium. Munich Re Foundation, International Labor Organisation, CGAP.

DIAZ NIETO, J., S. COOK, M. LUNDY, M. FISHER, D. SANCHEZ, E. GUEVARA (2006): A System of Drought Insurance for Poverty Alleviation in Rural Areas. Colombia, South America: Centro Internacional de agricultura Tropical (CIAT).

DLUGOLECKI et al. (2009) Coping with climate change: Risks and opportunities for insurers. Chartered Insurance Institute, London.

HÖPPE, P. and E. GURENKO (2006). Scientific and Economic Rationales for Innovative Climate Insurance Solutions, in Climate Policy, E. Gurenko, Ed. Special Issue on Insurance and Climate Change.

GINÉ, X., R. TOWNSEND, J. VICKERY (2007): Statistical Analysis of Rainfall Insurance Payouts in Southern India. Policy Research Working Paper. The World Bank - Development Research Group. Finance and Private Sector Team.

LEVIN, T. and D. REINHARD (2007): Microinsurance apsects in agriculture. Discussion Paper. Munich Re Foundation. CGAP Project.

MAEZ, M.S. and S. WONG (2006): Insurance in Emerging Markets: Sound Development; Greenfield for Agricultural insurance. In: Sigma. No. 1 (2007). Swiss Reinsurance Company. Economic Research and Consulting. Zurich.

MAPFUMO, S. (2007): Weather Index Insurance. The Case for South Africa. Micro Insurance Agency Holdings LLC.

MANUAMORN, O.P. (2007): Scaling up Microinsurance: The Case of Weather Insurance for Smallholders in India. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 36. The World Bank (Editor).

MAYNARD, T. (2008). Climate change: Impacts on insurers and how they can help with adaptation and mitigation. The Geneva Papers. Vol. 33 (140-146).

MCLEMAN, R. and B. SMIT (2006): Vulnerability to climate change hazards and risks:crop and flood insurance. In: The Canadian Geographer. Vol. 50, No. 2 (2006). Pp. 217-226.

MILLS, E. (2007). From risk to opportunity: 2007. Insurer responses to climate change. CERES report, October 2007. http://insurance.lbl.gov/opportunities.

MUNICH RE (2007). Topics: Natural Disasters. Annual Review of Natural Disasters 2006. Munich, Munich Reinsurance Group.

PROVENTION CONSORTIUM / IIASA (2005): Invest to Prevent Disaster. The Potential Benefits and Limitations of Microinsurance as a Risk Transfer Mechanism for Developing Countries. ProVention Consortium / IIASA.

Skees, J. R., B. J. Barnett, B. Collier (2008): Agricultural Insurance: Background and context for climate adaptation discussions. Paper for the OECD Expert Workshop on Economic Aspects of Adaptation, Paris, April 7-8 2008.

SKEES, J.R. (2008): Challanges for Use of Index-Based Weather Insurance in Lower Income Countries. GlobalAgRisk, Inc.

STERN et al. (2007). Stern Review Report on the Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.

United States Agency for International Development (2006): Index Insurance for Weather risk in Lower Income Countries. Prepared by GlobalAGRisk, Inc. Lexington.

WARD, R.E.T., HERJWEIJER, C., PATMORE, N., MUIR-WOOD, R. (2008). The role of insurers in promoting adaptation to the impacts of climate change. The Geneva Papers. Vol. 33 (133-139).

WILHELM, V. (2008): Weather Index-based Microinsurance in Developing Countries: Analysis and Evaluation. Vdm Verlag Dr. Müller. 76 pages.



Send to a Friend

Close Window